By the way: This is only a nice solution, if you can not offer the AP a 5gbit/sec port, since some APs do support up to 5gbit uplink speed (100/1000/2500/5000mbit/sec). But since the APs are capable of moving more than 1Gbps anyway (at least the higher-end models), having two 1Gbps links in a LACP trunk might be a very good solution. Sure, it uses twice as much copper as the previous solution. 51 watts of power delivery - 31.7 watts of power consumption = plenty of Watts to run the FAP-431/433G at full power! 🙂 This is called “ Dual PoE current sharing” and it can also solve the problem and is a valid solution if you have two network ports per AP in your building. You can simply double your 802.3at PoE lines to double the power. 👍Īs the 802.3bt PoE switches are quite expensive and still very rare, let’s move on to other possible solutions … Solution 3 – Dual PoE current sharing
The 802.3bt PoE standard, which can deliver up to 71 watts to the consumer. In our opinion, this is the most recommendable solution: We also have no specific numbers on how much the transmit power is being reduced.įortunately, there are three other solutions that are much more elegant than simply ignoring the problem: Solution 2 – Provide 802.3bt PoE that delivers up to 71 Watts of power If we had to guess, most customers will deploy these APs without even realising it.Īnd no, because you have a limited product that ends up not being used to it’s full potential.
Yes, because it solves the problem for most scenarios.
Now many of you will say that this is no longer a problem because this is a valid solution. Single 802.at PoE with no USB and reduced Transmit power. Well, Fortinet has obviously done the same calculation, as they have overcome this problem by reducing the AP’s transmit power when powered by an 802.3at PoE connection: What now? Solution 1 – Just ignore the problem So even if we use the 802.3at standard for the power delivery, we are still missing about 6.2 watts of power at the consumer end. At least since the newer and widely adopted 802.3at standard, this limit is 25.50 watts.īut this leads us to the following simple calculation: 25.50 watts of power delivery - 31.7 watts of power consumption = missing 6.2 watts to meet specifications ☹️ The fact that Power over Ethernet has some strict power limits, should concern us now.įor example, the older 802.3af PoE standard can only deliver up to 15.4 watts of power to a device. The maximum power consumption of a FAP-431F model was limited to 24.5 watts, but the new G-Series version could draw up to 31.7 watts! We noticed some interesting facts about the new large FortiAP G-Series models that we would like to share with you: When we studied the datasheet and the quick start guide of these new access points, we were surprised to see a drastic increase in power consumption:
0 kommentar(er)
